Clicky

Tag Archive: Diabetes

Victoza and the Incretin System Modulator Medications for Diabetes

Victoza is among what is becoming an increasingly crowded market for drugs that affect the incretin system of pancreatic beta cell function and control of insulin release.  The whole incretin system has been a bit more confusing to me than it needs to be primarily because of the nearly unpronounceable terms and similar acronyms.  I’ve figured out the basics of this system and will share that with readers first as the use of Victoza and the other drugs aimed at this whole process makes a lot more sense if you have a cursory handle on how the system works:

Eating –> Gut release of GLP-1 –> (DPP-4 rapidly degrades GLP-1) –> Stimulates Insulin release and Inhibits Glucagon release –>Lowers Blood Sugar.

GLP-1 analogues like Victoza and Byetta act on the GLP -1 pancreatic beta cells like GLP-1, to lead to lower blood sugar, especially after meals.  DPP-4 inhibitors like Januvia, Onglyza and Tradjenta inhibit the function of DPP-4 which otherwise very quickly, within about 2 minutes, degrades GLP-1.  This very short effect of natural GLP-1 due to very rapid DPP-4 degradation makes this system very agile and responsive to keep blood sugars controlled in the non-diabetic.  The GLP-1 analogues, Victoza and Byetta, can achieve somewhat higher GLP-1 like activity than is possible with the DPP-4 inhibitors, and generally have a modestly greater effect on reducing blood sugars than the DPP-4 inhibitors.

That said the orally administered DPP-4 inhibitors are often used first simply because they don’t require injection.   Despite its distinct advantage of a longer half life and so once daily injections instead of twice daily, Victoza has struggled to gain popularity likely because Byetta was first to market and had the advantage of being novel and more exciting than a second to market drug.  In addition the FDA release of a black-box warning about rodent research showing an increased risk of thyroid C-cell cancer in rats administered Victoza may have hurt Victoza in an attempt to gain market share. Those concerns seem at most minor, as this is a very rare cancer, and no evidence of higher risk in humans has come to light.

Type 2 diabetes is a gigantic problem that is increasing as our population grows older and fatter.  The GLP-1 analogues have a very attractive side-effect of modest weight loss making their adoption by patients with type 2 diabetes who are struggling to both control their blood sugars and to lose weight easier.  It is recommended that Victoza be initiated at 0.6 mg per day as a single subcutaneous injection at any time of the day, regardless of meals, and after 1 week the dose be increased to 1.2 mg daily.  If the desired reduction in blood sugar is not achieved the dose can be increased to 1.8 mg daily.

Side effects with Victoza are relatively uncommon, with only nausea, headache and diarrhea more common than with placebo and occurring in at least 5% of patients.  Pancreatitis is the most common serious Victoza side effect.

I side effect of Victoza that is desirable is modest weight loss.  Both alone and in combination with metformin Victoza led to an average weight loss of about 5-6 pounds over a year of use as compared to about a 2 pound weight gain in control patients treated with glimepiride (an older alternative oral diabetes medication in the sulfonylurea class).

As an interesting side note GLP-1 is a polypeptide, meaning it is made up of a string of amnio acids linked together.  Many hormones like thyroid hormone, insulin and others are polypeptides.  Scientists have learned how to analyze the sequence of amino acids in various polypeptides, and also to reproduce these polypeptides.  By doing this and making various modifications modern laboratories have devised synthetic polypeptides like Victoza which can function like the naturally occurring polypeptide but be resistant to the natural degradation process.  Victoza is a nice example of bench science paying dividends in new and unique medications.

You may also enjoy:

How to Treat Diabetes: What’s a Physician to Do?

 

@diabetictweets

After nearly 25 years in practice as a family doctor I have accumulated a large number of patients with diabetes.  Every day I see several patients for help managing their diabetes, and realize that many of them can use a bit of extra encouragement. I have set up @diabetictweets account to allow any patients with diabetes to get frequent words of encouragement and bits of advice I hope will be helpful.  I’ll also add tweets with links to articles and posts I think may be of interest.  Feel free to pass this on to your friends, patients, and anyone you feel may be interested.

Home Glucose Testing in Type 2 Diabetes

Home glucose monitoring in non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes has not been shown with any degree of confidence in controlled studies to improve either blood sugar control or prevent complications of diabetes.  Still it is commonly used by diabetics and commonly recommended by physicians to diabetics as an important aspect of their care.  What is the right thing to do?  The answer is not simple.

As a pretty valid rule of thumb, we should only do a test in medicine if the results are going by used to make a decision of some sort.  In diabetics who use insulin before each meal, and vary the dose of insulin based on their blood sugar prior to the meal, i.e. a sliding scale of insulin use, measuring their blood sugar before each meal is to obtain information on which to base a decision of how much insulin to inject.   This is a classic case of using diagnostic information to make a therapeutic decision.  On the other extreme a person with type 2 diabetes who is either not on medication at all, or who is on a steady dose of oral medication, and has been well controlled over the last few doctor visits, is not going to alter their diabetes treatment in any way based on home blood sugar monitoring, and a good argument can be made that they have no need to be measuring home blood sugars. 

In my practice I find many diabetic patients who find a good deal of comfort in checking their blood sugars more often than is needed to control their blood sugars.  Some patient s find daily, or even several times daily blood sugar monitoring to be strong positive feedback that reinforces their good behavior regarding diet and exercise.  Is this a good reason to do home blood sugar testing?  More to the point is should third party payers, including Medicare, pay for this testing even though there is little or no evidence that it leads to better health outcomes?

The cost of home blood sugar testing is not insignificant, For my uninsured patients it is often cost prohibitive to test blood sugars frequently.  For insured patient’s home blood sugar monitoring is usually paid for by insurance, so there is little incentive for them to affect cost savings by testing less often.  Medicare in particular pays very well for home diabetes testing.  I commonly am faced with non-insulin using diabetic patients who test several times daily, whose insurance companies decline to pay for this frequent testing based on lack of evidence that it is beneficial.  Patients then ask me as their physician to explain to the insurer why they need to test several times a day.  The reasons acceptable to the insurer usually include: insulin treatment, frequent hypoglycemia, and uncontrolled hyperglycemia.  Most of these patients have none of these reasons.  They just feel more confident when they know their blood sugars frequently.  This can lead to dissatisfaction by patients, and put me in the awkward position of being perceived as not advocating for a patient, when I have in fact suggested to the patient that they do less frequent home blood sugar testing.  This issue has been a hot topic in the UK recently.

I suspect that some of this desire to do frequent home blood sugar testing stems from the initial diabetes education patients are given.  Appropriately most new diabetics are taught how to test their blood sugars at home.  Also often we initially ask patients to test fasting, pre-prandial and post-prandial blood sugars in order to get them initially on an appropriate regimen of diet and medications.  I suspect that sometimes we don’t emphasize enough to new diabetics that they will likely want to reduce the frequency of home blood sugar testing after a stable regimen for treatment is achieved.

We are facing major issues regarding health care spending in America.  There is great evidence that control of blood pressure, cholesterol and blood sugars in diabetes can lead to reduced health care costs.  Still with the cost of a single home blood sugar test running about $1 the cost of even once daily home blood sugar testing for a diabetic is $3-400./ year.  There are approximately 25 million type 2 diabetics in the US.  Many need to be testing home blood sugars, but many do not.  We need to do a better job of giving our well controlled non-insulin using diabetic patient’s permission to test less or not at all, and yet encourage them to do the other things that do make a difference.  Diabetic eye exams, blood pressure control, and lipid control all have much better evidence for morbidity and mortality prevention than does home blood sugar testing. 

Diabetes care is such a big part of my practice I’ve started a twitter page to my patients (or any of you who are interested) to get frequent helpful or encouraging information about diabtes by following me @diabetictweets  Please visit and follow there.

Other posts you may like:

Agent Orange and Vietnam Veterans

Diabetes Management – It’s not Just About Blood Sugar

Leave a comment and let me know what you think.

Diabetes Management – It’s Not Just About Blood Sugars

As we learn more about diabetes it is becoming more and more clear that in order to prevent the complications of diabetes, and to improve both length of life and quality of life for diabetic patients, we need to target all cardiovascular risk factors.   Now when I see a patient with a new diagnosis of diabetes I emphasize right up front that in order to prevent the large and small blood vessel (macrovascular and microvascular) complications of diabetes we need not just good, but excellent control of their cholesterol and blood pressure, that we need them to quit smoking if they smoke, and that we need to control their blood sugars.  I tell them that blood sugar control, though important, is no more important, and possibly less important that these other factors.  The Birdges to Exceellence web tutorial suggests that cost savings to the health care system, a surrogate for hospitalizations and poor health outcomes is more influenced by blood pressure control and LDL cholesterol control than by blood sugar control.

 What do diabetic patients die from?  They die from cardiovascular diseases, primarily coronary artery disease and strokes, but also peripheral vascular disease.  An amazing 2/3 of diabetic patients will die of heart attack or stroke. This seems to be why we need to control hypertension and cholesterol levels in our diabetic patients.  If we let our patients die of cardiovascular disease with excellent blood sugar control we have not done them a service.

The good news is that now we recognize the importance of blood pressure and lipid management in diabetic patients.  We have many excellent medications to lower blood pressure so that most of these patients can get to goal blood pressures of less than 130/80.  We also have many excellent and proven medications to allow them to get to goal LDL cholesterol levels of less than 100, and often to the ideal of less than 70.  Many of these medications for both the cholesterol and blood pressure control are now inexpensive generic medications. 

The goals of good diabetes care include:

Blood pressure of < 130/80
LDL cholesterol of <100, with the aggressive goal of <70  

Hemoglobin A1C of <6.5%

These are listed in the likely order of importance.  Most of the data suggests that a Hemoglogin A1C of 7.5 in a diabetic is less concerning that a blood pressure of 150/92 or an LDL cholesterol of 145.

I see many diabetic patients who feel really good about their diabetes management because they have a nice low Hemoglobin A1C.  They take great pride in checking their blood sugars at home frequently, even though there is no evidence to show that frequent or even infrequent home blood sugar testing in type 2 diabetes improves outcomes.  This said they are far less motivated to aggressively control their blood pressure and lipid disorders.  We have a big reeducation process facing us to help our patients understand the need to address all of these issues to give them the best chance of a long and healthy life with diabetes.

How to Prevent Diabetes

By many estimates as many as 40 million Americans, or one in 5 of us has pre-diabetes.  Many of these people will develop diabetes.  The obvious question is how can we delay or prevent the development of diabetes in this vast group.  The good news is we know how to accomplish this. 

Value of home glucose monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes doubtful.

For some time we have known that more complications are prevented in diabetic patients by excellent blood pressure control and cholesterol control than by tight blood sugar control.  There is little proof that home blood sugar monitoring leads to better outcomes in non-insulin using diabetics.  I find I have more patients overtesting than undertesting.   In this  NY Times article by Roni Karyn Rabin she discusses this in more detail. 

Regimens: Questioning Benefit of Diabetes Test Strips

By RONI CARYN RABIN

Published: January 18, 2010

People with Type 2 diabetes are often advised to use blood-glucose test strips to monitor their blood sugar levels, but a Canadian analysis has found that routine self-monitoring is not cost-effective for many patients: the strips can cost almost a dollar each, and they prevent comparatively few complications of diabetes. To read more click here

You may also enjoy:

Pradaxa – an article ab0ut a new alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Lyrica vs Gabapentin to check out the pros and cons of these two medications for nerve pain management.

New screening test for diabetes recommended by the ADA

Millions of Americans have diabetes and do not know they have it.  Previously diagnosis often required a 2 hour glucose tolerance test, a hassle, and no fun.  Now the ADA has blessed the use of a simple inexpensive non-fasting test to screen for diabetes.  Use of the Hemoglobin A1C level, a test that has been used for years to assess the how well blood sugars have been controlled in recent weeks in diabetic patients is now recommended as diagnostic test to determine whether patients have Type 2 diabetes.  Now for vets exposed to Agent Orange making the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes is easier than ever.   This is good news!  See the Details

Also Enjoy:

Pradaxa 

Lyrica vs Gabapentin: A Family Doctor’s Perspective