Blood Pressure: How Low is Low Enough

A new clinical trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine called the SPRINT Trial ( Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial ) which compares standard treatment of hypertension to a goal of a systolic BP < 140 compared to more aggressive treatment to a goal of systolic BP <120 was published on Nov. 9, 2015.  It raises many questions and makes the most recent JAH – 8 recommendations subject to reevaluation.  In the SPRINT Trial almost 10,000 patients with hypertension felt to be at high risk to have a heart attack or stroke were randomly divided into two groups.  Standard treatment was to treat to a goal BP of <140 systolic.  Aggressive treatment was to treat to a goal of systolic BP <120. Patients with diabetes were excluded as were patients with a prior stroke.

The SPRINT Trial was stopped early because the results were felt to be definitive and showed a reduced risk of death, death from cardiovascular events like heart attack or stroke, and risk of having a non-fatal heart attack or stroke were all lower in the aggressive treatment group.  The statistical chance of an individual having a better outcome with more aggressive treatment is modest.  It would take treating 61 patients (Number needed to treat = NNN) to a goal BP of 120 vs 140 to prevent one heart attack or stroke, and the NNN for death from any cause was 90, and for cardiovascular death was 172.

The risk of serious adverse effects of medication including fainting, low blood pressure, non-fatal acute reduction in kidney function, electrolyte abnormality (low sodium or low potassium), or slow heart rate were slightly higher in the aggressive treatment group, and this group required on average about 1 additional prescription medication.

When JNC-8 (Joint National Committee on treatment of hypertension- 8th report) was released in 2014 the major change in hypertension treatment recommendations was less aggressive treatment for systolic hypertension in older patients (>60 yo) and in diabetic patients.  They recommended settling for a systolic BP of <150 in patients over 60 yo and for a systolic BP of 140 (vs the prior goal of <130) for diabetics.

Where all of this will fall out in practice remains in question, but I think pushing patients to a goal systolic BP of <120 is going to become more common, although even in this study the aggressive treatment group achieved an average systolic BP of only 121.  It is widely believed that less than half of Americans with hypertension achieve a goal of <140 currently.  Obviously it’s not going to be easy to achieve a goal of systolic BP <120 for many patients,  but at a minimum I think backing off on BP treatment for patients whose systolic BP gets into the 100-120 range and is assymptomatic is no longer reasonable, even when patients complain about how many pills they are taking and whether any of their meds can be stopped.

Editorial on PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer

If you’ve been following this blog for a while you may have noted a number of posts on the dilemma of overdiagnosis and PSA screening for prostate cancer.  We used to thing that all cancers has a common characteristic that once established they inexorably progressed, eventually becoming symptomatic and often lethal.  We now know that… Continue Reading

WHO: Red Meat, especially Processed Meat Causes Cancer

Although I believe the findings in the WHO report the conclusion of the WHO that eating processed meat, and even eating meat at all, causes cancer this information adds very little to my reasons not to eat meat. Some of you may recall from a prior post that I chose to eat a plant based diet… Continue Reading

It takes more than Ankylosing Spondylitis to Keep Guti Down

One of the very few good things about my beloved Seattle Mariners this year, besides Nelson Cruz crushing the ball, has been the call up of Franklin Gutierrez. Guti has been one of my favorite M’s over the years, and to see him struggle with his health concerns since 2011 has been really sad and… Continue Reading

The Mammograms or Not in Women 40-49 Controversy

As usual Dr. Kenny Lin, a former USPSTF member and prolific writer of “common sense” articles writes on how emotions rule rather than evidence and data when it comes to how people feel about breast cancer Check out his article: Countering the too neat narrative on screening mammography. Here are a couple of snippets for… Continue Reading

Personal Experience on a High Plant Based-Low Fat Diet

This post is unlike any I’ve put up over the years of  It is largely anecdote and not based on enough hard data that I will convince my physician friends.  Intrigued?  Read on. My son Brett has been on a journey with his diet and health over the last few years.  He has become… Continue Reading

USPSTF “Strong” Recommendations for Preventative Services.

This article is the second in a series on the USPSTF recommendations to health care providers and U.S. residents on recommendations for preventative care services.  The previous article listed 16 “D” recommendations, i.e. things you should not do in an attempt to prevent health problems.  In that article I selected the most relevant “D”: recommendations,… Continue Reading

SGR is History- Finally!

I started to write a post about the house and the senate finally coming up with a way to get rid of the regularly occurring threat to implement major Medicare payment decreases mandated by the SGR.  Last night, appropriately at nearly the last minute the Senate passed the house bill to repeal the SGR and… Continue Reading

You- Yes YOU Can Save a Life by Using an AED

This week Sound Family Medicine purchased a replacement AED (automated external defibrillator) for my clinic. I underwent a training session for use with the new device. It took about 1 minute. Open the container. Apply the pads. Turn on the machine. If it says to shock the patient make sure no one is touching the… Continue Reading